Big document, big hole, big subsidies, big toxic legacy

MEDIA RELEASE 1ST MAY 2009

SA's peak environmental body the Conservation Council of South Australia (CCSA), has today criticised BHP-Billiton after the release of the Environmental Impact Statement for its Olympic Dam expansion.  The special deals the company wants are unreasonable, unwarranted and will come at the expense of the natural environment.

The massive scale of the proposed expansion and the radioactive nature of the billions of tonnes of overburden and tailings that will be generated, mean SA must take action to avoid devastating environmental outcomes.

Under the terms of the Roxby Downs Indenture Ratification Act 1982, BHP-B is able to ignore and override legislation that would apply to any other mining operation.[1]

The current EIS looks likely to cement a worst case scenario of a toxic legacy left for future generations to deal with, long after BHP-B has taken the money and run.

“CCSA recognises the Olympic Dam expansion is big business” said spokesperson Jamnes Danenberg, “However this must not be at the expense of the natural environment or the detriment of ordinary Australians who will be subsidising the operation to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.”

The expansion will see everyday tax payers directly subsidising the “Big Australian”.  The diesel fuel rebate will mean the projected two billion litres of diesel, subsidised at 18.5 c per litre, will give the company upwards of $370 million!

Taxpayer subsidies are also slated for the desalination plant that will provide extra water for mining operations - over and above the current 35 million litres a day already sourced for free from the Great Artesian Basin.

Further, miners in SA pay half the royalties of their interstate counterparts, denying the SA public the true value of our natural resources.

The answers to the questions of how and where BHP-B will ‘offset’ the impacts of its operations are also major concerns.

“CCSA believes that BHP-B must do everything in its power to reduce the environmental impacts of its operation, including the massive blowout to the state’s greenhouse gas emissions,” said Mr Danenberg.

If the project is to go ahead, at the very least CCSA calls on BHP-B to commit to:

§                Sourcing 100% renewable power (potentially using geothermally generated electricity from nearby ‘hot rocks’

§                Moving the site of its proposed (part taxpayer funded) desalination operation away from the sensitive Pt Lowly site

§                Ensuring that any offsets to address impacts on biodiversity are conducted locally and that they are not seen simply as a ‘license to trash’ the fragile arid environment

For further information or comment contact CCSA Campaigner
Mr Jamnes Danenberg on 0411 028 930.

 


[1] The Roxby Downs Indenture Ratification Act overrides the Environment Protection Act, the Natural Resources Management (NRM) Act, Development Act, Mining Act and the Aboriginal Heritage Act among others.

 

Contact

Conservation Council of South Australia

Leve1/157 Franklin St

Adelaide SA 5000

phone (08) 82235155

fax (08) 82324782

email